Persons with physical disabilities

Welcome to our discussion board on the topic of persons with physical disabilities. We invite your comments, reflections and questions.

This past week I attended a

This past week I attended a conference focused on disabilities.  I was moved by one of the keynote presentations and would like to share a few snippets from it.  In my field there is so much emphasis on goal setting and being the "expert".  I loved that he completely debunked the idea of the "expert".  He spoke of how we so often try to peg people into what we think will work for them, instead of really listening to the individual and working together to find something that works.  He also troubled the idea that too often we get overly focused on the labels and finding the exact diagnosis and that what we need to focus on is the needs of the individual and how we can mutually meet those needs.  I also loved the fact that he emphasized over and over that people with disabilities have the exact same desires as those who do not have a disability.  I think that sometimes people in the field can lose sight that their client is truly a human being and have the same desires as those who do not have a disability.  They are just simply people who want to have relationships with others, yearn to  engage in meaningful activities and have a say with where they want to live and with who they want to live with. He also spoke of the "experts" not judging what their client determines to be meaningful. Over and over again he emphasized that that relationships need to be built between the worker and the clients before any true progress can happen.  He was an inspiring speaker and most likely ruffled some feathers in the crowd for which I applaud him!

Person centred

I really like what you've shared here about the importance of putting the actual person first.  It reminds me of a scene I saw in a movie recently where the indigenous poeples have an expression in their language that means "I See You" - somehow capturing the idea of "...I see into you...I see behind the face that you show me...I have come to know you..."

It seems to me that our challenge in work and in our lives is to "See" - to take the time, have the patience and the humility and the vulnerability to open our "eyes and see" who it is who is before us.

Inability to See

I apprecieted what you shared about us taking the time, patience, humility and specifically vulnerability to open our eyes and truly "see" the person who is in front of us.  As I read your post I was questioning- what is it in us that causes us to have the "inability" to truly see people.  I think that what you shared about us actually having to be vulnerable is part of the reason why at times we have the inability to truly see others.  It may be that we cannot put our own pride and arrogance aside in what we "know" must be right for the other person.  However, I think fundamentally on a deeper level it may be that if we make ourselves vulnerable in order to "see" others, our fear may be that in this vulnerability others may actually "see" us.  Although, I think truly being seen is what we all genuinely crave there is a degree of fear in that people may see the 'real' us and then reject us.

I think that for those of us who have chosen the path to work with people we really have to take seriously the gift of the work and honour that through seeing others and allowing others to see us.

Children with developmental delays

I work with children who have developmental delays. I know this heading of "persons with physical disabilities" is not quite the right heading for this subject, I know that a physical disability is not the same as an intellectual disability (developmental delay) but I believe this heading fits for me, because I am exploring my own conscious and unconscious bias and perhaps even cruelty in working with these children. 

I have a student who is very young (5) and on top of that quite delayed. She is non-verbal and not toilet-trained and requires pretty much constant one-on-0ne adult attention. Yesterday I ignored her as she struggled to pick up very small bingo chips from the floor (she had dumped them out herself). I now realize they were too small and slippery for her to pick up. She started moaning/groaning and then pulled down her pants and peed on the floor, which I ignored. Then the woman I work with cleaned this girl up. This little girl usually gives us a washroom card or makes a sign when she needs to go to the bathroom, but not yesterday.

It is very draining to work with this little girl -- emotionally draining I mean. She can be quite rough, yesterday she scratched me and pulled my hair. She often pulls my top at the neck, giggling all the while. So I guess I was mad at her yesterday. She is very attention-seeking, she needs attention (support) to be successful. But, thinking things over, I realize I took her behaviour very personally, and by ignoring her when she was with the bingo chips, I also lost sight of her. I think she may well have 'lost the plot' of what she was supposed to be doing. I think she didn't know, after a few minutes of struggle, that she was supposed to be picking these chips up. Then the moaning started, I think they were moans of confusion and isolation. I feel bad and am determined to try again today.

Thanks for reading.

I really hear your

I really hear your frustration and want to support you as you try again.  I work with people with Cerebral Palsy and sometimes feel frustrated with their vulnerability.  It challenges me to be more compassionate and less critical of my own vulnerabilities.  I am moved by your work with children so keep on keeping on!!

I really appreciate your

I really appreciate your honesty in sharing this story with us.  It sounds very challenging to be working with these children and I truly admire you.

I grew up in a family where any kind of need was considered abhorent and often responded to with rage and/or irritation.  I know that I carry this response deeply in my own body and have to consciously challenge it when it emerges at others, I try to remind myself of the "little girl lost" - but she is really hard for me to reach....more often than not all I feel is annoynace/irritation and vengefulness.

You are doing wonderful work and I see how you truly struggle with remaining conscious of your struggle, its the best that we can ask of ourselves.   

Dear Jurate - Dignity

I think that you ask wonderful questions because its esay to "toss" words around and not think terribly much about what we really mean by them.  I guess for me dignity is granting a respect and a place for difference - an open attitude of "teach me - let me learn from you" and "tell me what you need, I'm listening"

I feel like treating others with dignity is about inclusiveness - seeing where the blocks are to inclusion (visible or invisible) and paying attention to that, speaking it out loud, making it visible for everyone...and this is a particular challenge/responsibility of those in positions of priviledge...we must ask oursleve "what are the ways that I close off the circle of participation- and make a tight little circle of comfort and familiarity"

these are some of my thoughts...i'm interested in your response and your thoughts on this

 

I don't agree with concept "disabled"

Hello,

Thank's all of You for interesting comments.

Firs of all I want to apologize about my English. I am from Lithuania and my English is poor, but I will try to register my opinion.

Actually I don't agree with concept disabled, because it have negative meaning. In my opinion concept disabled show as that we are talking about person who is without abilities, without values. I don't agree with it, because all people have some abilities and some disabilities and all of as keep values, never mind are we person with disability or no. It's true that in all over the world live people who have social disabilities but they don't call disabled. So, why people with physical or mentall or etc. disabilities are calling disabled? Is it dignity in this conception? Is it respect in this conception? Is it equality? I think no. It's interesting why?

Who construct this concept and did ask about it people with disabilities opinion? I don't know, but it's possible that this conception came from people without disabilities (I have in my mind physical, mental or etc., but no social), I daresay.

I think, that more preferable conception is person with individual needs. It's true that all aff us have individual needs, so, this conception bridge all people.  I know that somewhere is actual to concretize this needs, so let's do it, but is it necessity all around? I think that person with disability is person with abilities, too and person without disabilities is person with disabilities, too, so conception disabled isn't well-chosen.

Best regards from Lithuania.

Jurate.

Thank you for your input.  I

Thank you for your input.  I agree that the word disability can be negative.  I prefer to think of a human being as an individual with different needs or a person with individual needs.  We all have strengths and areas for development.  I am so glad that you are challenging  me to think more about this word "disability".   

Thank You. Actually I don't

Thank You. Actually I don't mind about word "disability" because some disabilities and some abilities are every day reality, it's part of our lifes. But I don't agree with conception disabled, because it's like negative sign: stigma, label, rank and etc.

the problem with labels

Thank you for your very well articulated challenge to the issue of labels - especially as it pertains to "disabled".  I agree entirely with you around the concern that disabled carries a negative connotation - everyone does have abilities and challenges - so perhaps the term "challenged" is a better reference point.

Although, I think that all labels carry very real limitations because we are always talking about people...and people cannot be captured in a "word" - we are so much more diverse and nuanced, we always overflow the labels that attempt to confine, constrain and capture us.

This is why I think these discussions around lables are so necessary and important - I like that words get contested and wrestled with - we always need to challenge how we talk about people and think about what it means to label others (and oursleves, for that matter).

Thank you for your challenge and insight.

About labels, Baudrillard simullacrum and etc.

My pleasure was and is "to be" there (in this link). Thank you, I a'm interesting in your ideas. It's interesting to read about "new label" "challenged", but I am not sure that I understand it clearly. Does it mean challenge (when somebodey have to do something "complicated, provocative", or it's the same like "disabled" in the other word? I am boglle at "challenged", because in my English-Lithuanian dictionary challenged translations is the same like disabled, but when I read your ideas I think it's more like challenge (to do something complicated, provocative and etc.). Which point is near yours?

Last year I was reading J. Baudrillard's book about simulacra and simulation. When I finished this book I started think that label "disabled" is clear simulacrum, like a lot of other things in our life's. I'm not sure, but in my opinion this Baudrillard theory is very pesimistic and I'm not happy that after this book I have done conlusion that in our lifes is a lot of simulacrum and simulation... But there are good point too, because we can to do something for canges. Of course we need to thinkining, planing, doing, reflecting and anew.

Jurate.

In the hope that together we can create dignified society.

 

 

P.S.

I know that R. Fuller was writting about rankism in his book "Dignity for all". I saw this book only in google, but I think in this book is very interesting ideas, specificaly when we are discussing about labeling. Why we need to label? Are we need? I think no.

J.

Labels and Rankism

Thank you J. for your very engaging comments. 

And yes I was using the term "challenge" in the sense of provocative, complicated, engaging...we all face challenges that we struggle with and rise to meet and so the "playing field" is even for us all.  I really appreciate your comment about a dignified society and Fuller's challenge to us all to deconstruct "rank" (or the hierarchies that we utilize to create "somebodies" and "nobodies").  It seems to me, that this idea cuts across all the "isms" (sexism, racism, classism, able-ism, etc.) and leaves us with the concept of how we erase people and their dignity by deeming them or treating them as nobodies. 

And I think that we can propagate rankism through our labels and language in a very powerful way and likewise we can unpack it through our language too.  And this leads me to your comments on simulacrum and simulation...the recognition that our langauge has the power to create reality for us...both socially and psychologically.

Labels have the power to evicerate experiences that occur outside the very narrow limitations of that particualr label...I was speaking with someone recently who shared with me that there are aboriginal langauges that do not have nouns, only verbs...which seems to me to allow for a reality rooted in process and change, rather than one that seems to reify and "pigeon hole" life.

i like the idea of the former...a reality rooted in process and movement.  

In reply about labels and rankism

 Thank You for involvementing cogitations and explain (about "challenged"). Do you know is it label somewhere usable? I know that in Lithuania it isn't.

So, when I'm thinking facile the conception "challenged" seems winsome... But if we clearly agree with Fuller it isn't rigorous notion. It's interesting is in rankism only negative aspects, or we can find some positive aspects in it, and how we can do it?  If we can't find maybe we can create positive rankism??? Is it essential? What is your opinion?

I absolutely agree with you in this point "our langauge has the power to create reality for us...both socially and psychologically".

I dont understand (and don't find translation in my dictionary) what does "evicerate" mean?

Sun at hearts all of us:)

Reply to J

I truly enjoy this dialogue with you and might I say, I am blown away by you dialoguing in English!!

So in Canada, we sometimes use the word "challenged" when dealing with individuals who are differently-abled.  Perhaps this latter term is even better though becuae it denotes differnce but also ability.

By the way...I apologize for my spelling "eviscerate" is the correct spelling and it means "to remove the guts from"

I think you ask a very important question about whether or not there is anything positive around hierarchy or is it always negative?  For instance is there an issue of "rank" if there is leadership?  Is hierarchy or rank an inherent aspect to social relations? Even in democracy (and I'm thinking in its ideal form - which I'm not sure has ever been experienced) some lead the group and is this problematic?

I know I just keep asking questions, but I'm not sure how we can think about a system where talents and differences can be held in an open space that does not lead to the dangers inherent in rankism.  I know that Habermas suggests that this kind of radical democracy can be facilitated through dialogue...so that if everyone's voice gets heard just social relations can occur.  However, I have questions about this isssue of voice and the meanings and values that get attached to these voices - and what about silencing?  Not everyone feels free to speak.  

what are your thoughts on this?

 

???

My pleasure to have dialogue with you and the best compliment for me is that you blown away by my dialoguing in English. Thank you :)

I agree that not everyone feels free to speak... But is it problem only in feeling free or not free? I think in this case we can remember P. Freire "dialogue action theory" (I'm not sure is it clear in English...) and maybe not only this theory but all his thoughts about "pedagogy of oppresed". If I, you or somebodey in all his life was and is in "oppresed" position  is it easy to imagine that some can be different like is now? If it's easy to imagine is it the same about power to create? About Habermas ideas I know very very very little but in my opinion it might be that Freire is near Habermas ideas when they thinks about dialogue necessity amit various groups of comunity. How can we have effective dialogue in practice? Actually, I have not clear answer, but if we remember Freire we can have dialogue only if we love people, so we must to love (I like this).  In my opinion love is "friends" with trust, listening, hearing (what somebodey said), respect and etc. It might be that people who aren't in "oppresed" position can be facilitators for this people who are in "oppresed" position if they loves thems. So, if people without disabilities love peoples with disabilities they can have constructive dialogue... Easy to write, but what is love??? Actually, there are to many questions and to little answers...  If I will have to decide where can I found some Ideas about dialogue and how can I have dialogue it's in P. Freire papers.

About rankism... I would like to read all Fuller's book... At this moment I think that we can speak about 2 types of rankism, one type - positive rankism, second - negative. So we can live without negative rankism and we don't mind about positive rankism:)

Pedagogy of the Oppressed

Its been a while since I read Freire...but I agree that dialogue needs to come from a place of love - as you said to listen actively, to work to understand the subjective experience of the other (while holding that ther are always gaps in my ability to know the other because of difference)and to be able to hold the tension that not knowing creates. 

This is where i think the social meets the psychological (or the psychotherapeutic)...as I understand the therapeutic journey, its about learning to break down the judgements and fears with in ourselves that can block us from "loving" others in a way that leaves them free to be different from us and yet acknowledged as an equally valuable subjectivity/individual.

I agree too that ther can be positive rankism - but we need to deconstruct the negative form.

About deconstructing...

We can imagine, that all agreed to deconstruct the negative rankism, but how to do it? Have you ideas? How we can seek changes in this area?

Thoughts on deconstructing rankism

I don't think that there are any simple answers to this because i believe it takes both social and personal transformation to begin this process.  I think that our dialogue together is a beginning point - as we've said earlier, the importance of listening and trying to understand the experiences of the other - is an important part in deconstructing negative hierarchy.

Another piece that keeps coming up for me is: can we tolerate and hold the rage that the oppressed have and feel towards those of us implicated in the oppression.  And can I acknowldge my implications in that oppression (this is part of the personal work that I think needs to happen) - and this is very hard to do...because then I (we) have to bear the guilt and shame of my (our) poisitons of privieldge that is built on the backs of the oppressed. 

Its not a "pretty" process that is all warm hugs, peace signs and flowers - I think its one of the reasons negative hiearchy so tenaciously hangs on (not the only reason, of course).

what are your thoughts?

I'm very interesting in Your

I'm very interesting in Your opinion about dignity. In various legislation and other alike doc. is written that it's important to protect (save??)  human dignity. Are we protecting human dignity whe we are using terms like disabled, or people with disabilities?

Jurate.

P.S. I's very interesting what is dignity for You?

Some times I think that it's

Some times I think that it's impossible to deconstruct rankism.  I don't like my thoughts, so it will by great if I'm wrong.

Inspired!!

I have wanted to post on this message board for a long time and an experience I had yesterday was so touching it made breaking the silence a lot easier. Yesterday I attended lunch with my sister, mother, old kindergarden teacher and her daughter. I was absolutely touched by the teachers daughter who went blind when she was about 25 years old from diabetes. This lady was one of the most inspiring people I have ever come across. She was so full of life and motivation. She beamed from ear to ear and I was fascinated with every word she spoke. Even as I sit her describing her I feel I can't do her justice. I was a little apprehensive about attending this lunch and as I walked up to her apartment I was nervous. I was very in tune with my anxiety at the time. Before even seeing this lady I wanted to cry for her and her situation but I do not like showing emotion to my family and I had only remembered meeting this lady once before when I was a small child. I remember the meeting very vividly which suprises me. I was with my mother shopping and we ran into her in a store. She had her seeing eye dog with her and he was big beautiful yellow lab. I remember I wasn't allowed to pet the dog because he was "working". To this day I love labs and maybe this is an insight to as of why. I am also amazed at how clear this memory is. I can recall the store it was in and I was probably only 6 years old. When I walked through her front door she looked as I had remembered her. She has the most beautiful ocean blue eyes. Her spirit and liveliness captivated me immediately. I found however throughout lunch that since I am a quiet person I might not have been heard as much as I wanted to be heard and since she is blind I felt a little lost in the conversation which was taken over by my mother and sister. A dynamic that slapped me in the face yesterday. There was one point during the conversation at the table I moved the centerpiece so she could see me and I could see her. I had for a minute many times throughout the visit forgotten she was blind. She was just that captivating. I have a habit of drifting off during conversations but I heard every word she said and was completely focused on the conversation. I didn't want to leave. I wanted to sit and talk to her all afternoon just the two of us. I am also not a hugger but I hugged this lady goodbye and fought back the tears. I hope since she couldn't see my body language that she could at least sense my interest and hopefully take me quietness in a positive way. This lady also had an amazing sense of humor about life. Her love for her parents was also something I had never seen expressed so openly before. I left lunch feeling inspired and couldn't wait to share my story. I was actually excited which was great. I hope to be able to speak with this lady in the future. There was so much I took away from this lunch in such a short period of time. I walked in with tears for her but then quickly realized how happy, content, independent and loved she is. I walked out with tears for me.

Inspiring

Thank you for your beautiful post, you may have been inspired, but your story was inspiring and I feel touched by it.  It reminds me how seeing transcends what we normally think of as sight.  I feel like you both saw each other deeply and this is true and neccesary vision.  I hope you get a chance to connect with this lovely woman again.

Our greatest gift to each other is to be seen and known - at least that is my experience. 

Physically Challenged or

Physically Challenged or Disabled?

There are many terms used to refer to people born with a physical disability. Some I like, some I can’t stand and some I like but...

The term I hate most, when used to refer to people who are physically different is invalid, because it means not valid or having no value. I don’t think anything living, human or animal deserves to be thought of as something with no value.

The next term I have a problem with is crippled. I have never heard anybody use that term for any other reason than to degrade someone.

I despise with passion the term physically challenged. Anybody whether able-bodied or disabled, can challenge themselves physically. While that person is challenging himself he is physically challenged. It makes no difference whether the person is a baby learning to roll over, or a world class athlete.

Physically challenged as it refers to the disabled, is politically correct sugar coated bunk, that tells people nothing about the person who is being labelled. I am not physically challenged, unless I choose to be. I am physically different from the majority of the population and have been since birth. It’s not pretty, fun, or by choice, but it is my black and white everyday reality. No sugar coating, no pity party just a fact I’ve come to terms with.

The term disabled is good in the sense that it tells people I’m different and they usually assume it’s a physical difference. The term can be negative depending on the people using it and their tone of voice, but most people use it with respect. It does mean, not able, which depending on the circumstances, may not be true. If I see a reason to achieve something I usually accomplish what I set out to do; although I usually do things differently from other people and when I do something or give something, I give all I have.

I believe, with all I have that people who have a disability are more disabled than they need to be, because they have been conditioned and taught to react a certain way by able-bodied people. From a very early age we’re taught that we don’t measure up. We need to be fixed, kept in a vegetative state, protected from the world, thought of as mentally incompetent and expected to become more independent than able- bodied people are ever asked to be. If an able-bodied person asks a friend for help they’re being resourceful. If a disabled person asks a friend for help or support, they risk being labelled clingy, needy, lazy, co-dependent, stupid, incompetent and on and on, when in reality we’re just being our true selves, when we admit real needs, feelings and vulnerability. The only difference between me and everyone else in the vulnerability/ needs department is that I’m more honest about it. When you spend 2-3 times longer than most able bodied people, just getting dressed, fed, washed, and doing what you need to  survive, you learn to conserve energy by forgetting to put on a fake mask, and hoping there are a few people in the world brave enough to love the real you. I don’t have the energy to waste telling lies and hoping I don’t forget which lie I told to which person. I also can’t guarantee that I’ll be healthy enough to be with friends when they want me to be, or that I’ll be alive to tell them I love them tomorrow; so every memory and every minute spent with someone I love counts in ways I’ll never be able to explain.

Low self esteem doesn’t become a part of a disabled person’s life by accident. It comes from years of abuse, neglect, rejection, isolation and being told your best is not good enough. Most disabled people will tell you they become skilled at living up or down to the expectations of the person they’re with at the time. If you want to survive, without being physically or emotionally beaten down, you learn quickly to give powerful people and strangers what they expect and give the people you respect and love your best effort and the truth as you know it. People get from me exactly what they expect. If all they believe about me is that I have nothing to offer them, they’ll teach me to believe that too. If they care enough to believe I have something to offer them, they’ll see me grow as I gain the confidence to risk making an effort to meet their needs. Very few able-bodied people are brave enough to ask a disabled person to help them. Our best effort is usually good enough for others, but they’re too proud to expect that we could give them anything of value; so our potential is often undiscovered and underdeveloped.

One of my favourite terms for the disabled believe it or not is handicapped. Yes I know it comes from the term, hand in cap which is a reference to someone who begs, but I prefer to think of it in more positive terms. It tells people I’m different and that I have more obstacles to overcome than the average able-bodied person, but it doesn’t imply that I can’t overcome and succeed in my own unique way. When I think of the term handicapped, I see it as a challenge to overcome, like a jockey in a horse race. I haven’t lost at life until I quit trying, just as a jockey hasn’t lost the race until it’s over.

My favourite term of all is used by those very special people who take the time to really know me and value me enough to call me friend. I’m not disabled around them. I’m just me. They’re the people who are not too proud to expect good things from me, and usually get what they expect. No sweeter gift can I get than friends who let me love them and show me love, and who value my skills enough to let me want to use them for their benefit. Those people I label true friends and I hope they label me the same way.

Kathy Prue

 

 

 

Thanks Kathy

Thank you Kathy for your post, which I read a week or two ago but didn't reply to. In fact your words were with me and just a couple of days ago I was marveling over the origin of 'handicapped' which I didn't know about until I read your post. I love how you ended your post, that your favourite term of all is friend. The whole piece is very thoughtful and thought-provoking. Thank you for sharing.

Thank you for sharing your

Thank you for sharing your experience with the "disability" language.  I know and am friends with people with physical disabilities and love them for just being themselves.  For me, we are all "disabled" to a lesser or greater degree.  As you seem to understand, it is what we do with our disability that is a challenge.  My community of colleagues and friends as well as my chosen family help me daily with my disability/vulnerability.  I am also thankful to have a loving psychotherapist that I can talk to regularly! 

I'm curious, why is it that

I'm curious, why is it that disabled people are considered by most able-bodied people to be people who have nothing to offer them and would rather sit home and vegetate than do something productive? It seems everybody has an idea about how we can be fixed, but very few people want to love us and share their lives with us unless they're paid for it.

I don't want to be fixed and I don't want to be anybody's psychology project or church project. I need someone to love who loves me, things I'm passionate about to do, something to look forward to and a dream to dream that brings hope to my heart like everyone else. Why do able-bodied people find this so hard to understand?

All of us want to be productive to the extent that we can be. Instead we spend all of our time filling out forms and justifying our need for services that able bodied people don't need. Why can't we justify our need for services and financial help once, if our disability is ongoing and be allowed to get on with our lives? I'm constantly filling out the same forms for the same people with the same answers year after year. If nothing has changed why duplicate the paperwork?

Why not make the buildings accessible, the finances and care adequate without being degrading, and tap in to what we have to offer you as people? Just because we do life differently from most in some ways, doesn't mean what we are capable of is not good.

The first thing people ask about a newborn baby is, is it healthy, meaning non disabled. Does being disabled make us less human or less worthy to exist than others? Why? People who are different in some way, still have good things to offer, but often when we offer our best nobody wants it.

Most people will suffer from some sort of disability at some point in their lives, if from nothing else than the aging process. What will it take for us as a society to realize that everyone is born with talents and gifts and we are all responsible for each others well being and happiness? No person is supperior to another. Anyone can become disabled at any time. Why can't we all strive to live life of  compassion as loving human beings instead of talking about it? Everybody has something to offer the world, but without encouragement to develop and use our talents, much of what we could become never comes to full bloom and much of what we have to give is either undiscovered or wasted. How different our world would be, if everybody's abilities were developed to the fullest and everyone felt useful, needed and loved.

No doubt some of what I've said here is politically incorrect. I don't want to be politically correct. I'm just a human being trying to be loving and caring in a world that doesn't often want the best I have to give, because it doesn't fit people's ideas of who I should be and how I should live my life. I'm doing the best I can trying to give my best, make each day count and find meaning to my existence. I don't need to be given another label to tell me what's wrong with me. If my potential is ever to be reached I need to receive the gifts of hope, acceptance, love and usefulness, and have someone willing to receive those gifts from me; so that I have reason to cultivate and use the best that I am. Help me if you can, but if you can't help please don't put anymore obstacles in my way than I already have.

Kathy P

Thank you for your post.  I

Thank you for your post.  I work for an agency who mission is to support people with disabilities and the frustrations which you speak of are echoed by many people that we work with.  The population I work with for the most part were able-bodied people prior to their injury so in some respects they know what it is like to live free from the discrimation and now they have to contend with being disriminated against. I recall speaking at a conference and a woman whose impairment was great, shared some of her struggles during our open session.  She spoke of how angry it makes her when as a 45 year old woman people come up to her, pat her on the head and treat her like a child.  She also spoke of the humilation of these expereinces.  I was deeply moved by what she shared and her openess and vulnerablity to share her feelings around her expereinces.  I think that there is so much ignorance and fear in our society around being comfortable with those who do not present as the "norm".  Thank you for challenging all of us through your post.

Thank you so very much for

Thank you so very much for your beautiful and thought provoking comments.  The challenge to able-bodied people is an important one and the dialogue across difference is essential. 

I carry the memory of being a child of about 7 and being taken to a swim day at the Sick Kids hospital by a nurse friend of the family.  I was and am an able-bodied person and the family friend did not tell me that the kids I'd be swimming with were challenged through missing limbs.  In the dressing room by myself, I was scared when the kids began to remove prosthetic arms and legs.  No one explained to me what was going on and I felt frightened and ashamed.  There was no adult support for the experience to help me process these differences and feel a sense of comfort.  It remained for many years, until I had an opportunity to process the experience with a caring and wise therapist, a place inside of me that generated feelings of shameful discomfort.  I realized that what was missing was dialogue about the experience, a way to make sense of it from a child's perspective. Had I had dialogue I feel that a greater sense of understanding and connection would likely have been possible because I do remember how wonderful these children were - their exuberance and joy. I especially recall one little boy swimming with no legs and how happy and playful he was. 

I am still moved by the memory of their happiness and liviliness, it was a sharp contrast to the little able-bodied girl who suffered in silence from an abusive family that was shredding apart during that time.